Nada on Soler; hearing Orioles might be more in on Cespedes than we thought. RT @furso27: @Kevin_Goldstein anything new on cespedes/soler?
Nada on Soler; hearing Orioles might be more in on Cespedes than we thought. RT @furso27: @Kevin_Goldstein anything new on cespedes/soler?




Zach wrote:I would say looking at the development of Britton could easily be a 5 to add to you list. A possible 6 is watching the prospects of contender teams with a need for an arm so we can see possible players to get when we trade Guthrie.



Matt P wrote:I'd rather just extend Jones.

ofahn wrote:Matt P wrote:I'd rather just extend Jones.
IMO his TRADE value is a LOT more than his FIELD value.
ofahn wrote:Matt P wrote:I'd rather just extend Jones.
IMO his TRADE value is a LOT more than his FIELD value.


birdwatcher55 wrote:I wonder if the Guthrie deal might be tied into this in some way financially??

ofahn wrote:birdwatcher55 wrote:I wonder if the Guthrie deal might be tied into this in some way financially??
I don't think so. The Guthrie deal was almost a wash financially. Besides, we had almost 40M come off of the books at the end of the season. So far, we've spent less than 20M of it including raises. There should be plenty of money left.

Jordan wrote:ofahn wrote:birdwatcher55 wrote:I wonder if the Guthrie deal might be tied into this in some way financially??
I don't think so. The Guthrie deal was almost a wash financially. Besides, we had almost 40M come off of the books at the end of the season. So far, we've spent less than 20M of it including raises. There should be plenty of money left.
Yeah, I believe Guthrie is making 300K less than Lindstrom and Hammel.
But as you stated they definitely have the money for Cespedes if they want him.



Users browsing this forum: Old Sneakers, Seafordeagles and 7 guests