

allstar1579 wrote:This would be a good year to monitor the rule 5 draft closely. They should have gone after Hamilton like they discussed internally but chickened out on. Should be watching to see who is non-tendered too, could be a good sized list since teams are worried about the CBA impact and trying to reset salaries a bit.

LukeScottsShotgun wrote:allstar1579 wrote:This would be a good year to monitor the rule 5 draft closely. They should have gone after Hamilton like they discussed internally but chickened out on. Should be watching to see who is non-tendered too, could be a good sized list since teams are worried about the CBA impact and trying to reset salaries a bit.
I'm pissed that the Red Sox brought up Lars Anderson. I was hoping we could claim him during Rule 5, but now that's not an option unless they DFA him.


LukeScottsShotgun wrote:I hope we can get Anderson via the Rule 5. Has lots of raw power. He's definitely worth taking a flyer on. Just as long as we don't pick a guy who hasn't seen anything above A ball like we did when we picked Bautista way back when.

allstar1579 wrote:LukeScottsShotgun wrote:I hope we can get Anderson via the Rule 5. Has lots of raw power. He's definitely worth taking a flyer on. Just as long as we don't pick a guy who hasn't seen anything above A ball like we did when we picked Bautista way back when.
We had the right idea, we just didn't execute the development. In order to take someone in the rule 5 you have to have a slot on the roster to throw away for the season, you can't expect too much production, you just want to expose them and get them learning, then send them back down to finish baking after the season. Jason Johnson way back was a good example of that, but it's why RP go more often because they can be stashed in the pen, pitch 30-40 IP and then sent back to the minors after the season.
It's the teams that have had top minor league systems for a few years that you want to target in the rule 5, teams like the Red Sox, Rangers, Rays etc. the ones that can't clear out room on the 40 man fast enough for all the top guys to get in there, that's how you find a diamond in the rough.


cubscoutsrock54 wrote:I don't really see the Red Sox designating Anderson after just purchasing his contract. If they feel he isn't ready he'll probably just get sent down to AAA while remaining on the 40-man roster. Sure, he might have to share playing time with Rizzo should he be promoted, but I would imagine that is the better option for the Sox than designating him.
If he did get designated, would he have to pass through waviers before being eligible for Rule 5? If that were the case, I think that'd actually work out better for the O's, since they wouldn't have to put Anderson on the active roster if they picked him up that way. I guess the downside to that would be we'd have to work out a trade in that event, right?


CamdenRevival wrote:I wonder if Alex Gordon could ever be a possibility. He was the 3rd Base version of Matt Wieters from a couple of years earlier (ultra-high draft pick, incredible minor league #s, annointed the next George Brett). Now, he's turned into Billy Rowell (flashes but no consistency, move him around the field, etc).
He definitely needs a change of scenery and, while he won't necessarily come cheap, I could see the Royals trying to deal him for a solid young arm. Much like Chris Nelson (though more expensive), his higher upside could be worth a gamble.

CamdenRevival wrote:I wonder if Alex Gordon could ever be a possibility. He was the 3rd Base version of Matt Wieters from a couple of years earlier (ultra-high draft pick, incredible minor league #s, annointed the next George Brett). Now, he's turned into Billy Rowell (flashes but no consistency, move him around the field, etc).
He definitely needs a change of scenery and, while he won't necessarily come cheap, I could see the Royals trying to deal him for a solid young arm. Much like Chris Nelson (though more expensive), his higher upside could be worth a gamble.



Don wrote:I am shocked that I have seen so many posts without one of the obvious names not going off the board.
Brandon Webb
You are getting a flawed pitcher, but one of the best ground ball ratio in the history of baseball. His game sets up perfectly for Camden Yards and the AL East. He is already improving throwing off the mound with increased velocity during instructional league play. He feels somewhere in the 85-90% range and should be ready to go full tilt by spring training. He will be an un-restricted free agent that will fly under the radar because two other big name pitchers might grab the first attention of the big clubs.
It might take a risky contact that could be mutually terminated to give both the pitcher and team some options out after the first or second season in order to attain a larger contract.
I would not mind seeing Carl Palvano in an Orioles uniform as well.
The Orioles will target ground ball pitchers, so guys like Zambrano and Young are off the table.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests