

Jordan wrote:Good question, and honestly, I'm not sure why Buck hasn't used him yet.
I didn't realize how good Patton was against lefties...
3.02 FIP, .229 AVG, 1.03 BB/9, 7.01 K/9.



slob wrote:I've been wondering the same thing. I'd like to see if he would be a better option than Hendrickson next year.

LukeScottsShotgun wrote:slob wrote:I've been wondering the same thing. I'd like to see if he would be a better option than Hendrickson next year.
I would compile a list of our pitchers who would be an upgrade over Hendrickson, but it's simpler to just make a list of who WOULDN'T be an upgrade over Hendrickson:
Alfredo Simon
Frank Mata
Viola
Fat Albers
That's about it.

BuckMagic wrote:LukeScottsShotgun wrote:slob wrote:I've been wondering the same thing. I'd like to see if he would be a better option than Hendrickson next year.
I would compile a list of our pitchers who would be an upgrade over Hendrickson, but it's simpler to just make a list of who WOULDN'T be an upgrade over Hendrickson:
Alfredo Simon
Frank Mata
Viola
Fat Albers
That's about it.
I'd put Simon and Hendrickson in the same category. Both can be serviceable relievers but on contending teams they are worthless.


CamdenRevival wrote:I think Patton is just too low on the depth chart. Given the current bullpen members, guys like Mickilio & Sarfate who are either on the 40-man or just off it, and the likely scenario where Andy signs a couple of guys over the offseason, Patton is trade bait and best (if he has any trade value) and he could kill that value with a couple of disastrous outings at the ML level. Probably better to keep the mystery intact and let some team think they can reclaim him (which, frankly, may be possible).



Users browsing this forum: OriolesRedskins28 and 11 guests