

TuckerBlair89 wrote:I think you are being a LITTLE harsh on Machado. But like you said, he seems to be making the adjustments and I think he will put up a good season this year in AA. I watched him last season twice and came away very impressed. He just has the look of a "star"


Rising O's wrote:2014-2015 is about what I would want as it gives the Orioles the potential to have a starting rotation of seasoned pitchers and a couple of guys around 28 who can lead the offense. Its why they need to continue to move major league players who are not going to be in their primes as we promote the players on BA's list.


Zach wrote:Shoop I think would be a rush to get him there by 2014



kwalker35 wrote:You are telling me that you can't rate 10 players that are prospects that are on minor league teams.

kwalker35 wrote:The problem I have with BA lists , they have players rated that has not played any pro ball yet. This makes the organization look even worse in their developement of talent. You are telling me that you can't rate 10 players that are prospects that are on minor league teams.

kwalker35 wrote:You are telling me that you can't rate 10 players that are prospects that are on minor league teams.
Shorebirdfan wrote:2. When we have players that are ready, we let them move on to another team (see Justin Turner, Peado Beato).

CSPitt17130 wrote:kwalker35 wrote:You are telling me that you can't rate 10 players that are prospects that are on minor league teams.
The people making these lists don't rely solely on minor league statistics to determine the top prospects. Scouts look at tools, mechanics, etc. and weigh those with how well they performed. They can look at players like Bundy and know that they are better prospects than guys who have played in the minors.Just because Bundy hasn't thrown a pitch in the minors doesn't change the fact that he has hit 100 mph, has four usable or better pitches, and a very repeatable delivery as an 18 year old. If they're part of the organization now, they're a prospect for the organization, and why not include them in the rankings? Because someone throws 100 MPH doesn't make him a pitcher. This kid has been throwing HS baseball, not college. Until he proves himself, not just physically but between the ears, he can't be judged a top prospect. Besides, remember our Minor League spring training last year, we looked like a mash unit with all the arm injuries to our young pitchers. Until we change how things are done, with our young arms, we will always be behind in the process. We had no roving pitching instructors to evaluate the young guys, in the minor leagues and maybe give them some guidance. That might be trivial to some but we were the only organization that didn't have a roving pitching instructors. Bundy might be legit but with our current system he could fall to injury or not get the proper coaching to move him along.Shorebirdfan wrote:2. When we have players that are ready, we let them move on to another team (see Justin Turner, Peado Beato).
You say this like having those guys would make the Orioles better. They're replacement level or worse. The O's aren't letting anyone worth anything go for free.

Because someone throws 100 MPH doesn't make him a pitcher. This kid has been throwing HS baseball, not college. Until he proves himself, not just physically but between the ears, he can't be judged a top prospect. Besides, remember our Minor League spring training last year, we looked like a mash unit with all the arm injuries to our young pitchers. Until we change how things are done, with our young arms, we will always be behind in the process. We had no roving pitching instructors to evaluate the young guys, in the minor leagues and maybe give them some guidance. That might be trivial to some but we were the only organization that didn't have a roving pitching instructors. Bundy might be legit but with our current system he could fall to injury or not get the proper coaching to move him along.

CSPitt17130 wrote:Throwing 100 mph doesn't make him a pitcher but everything else I mentioned about him does: 4 pitches, repeatable delivery, good command, etc. He's already shown that he has tremendous work ethic and has it together mentally. Maybe your definition of prospect is different than those of the people who do this professionally. None of them would say that Dylan isn't a top prospect.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests