

Jordan wrote:Reynolds take over LF

ofahn wrote:Jordan wrote:Reynolds take over LF
Do you think Reynolds could be an average or better defender in LF?


Rising O's wrote:The nugget is protected by Buck so what can a fan say? Have you ever looked at his numbers based on batting order? Yikes. That's what makes the 42 million remaining on the contract hurt. 14 million a year for a #2 hitter is expensive, especially for a team that loses 94 games a year. The fact that he failed to even attempt to steal bases the previous two years indicates a lack of effort to me, failing to use every ounce of talent to help your team win. At least try, its not like by running you are taking the bat out of our clean-up hitters hands because we never had one.
Anyway, it should be clear I would like to see him traded. His age puts him outside the core the Orioles should be looking at and again, we're losing with him so may as well lose without him if you can get prospects who can help down the road. I think there are a few contenders that might like to have him and hope he can renew himself outside of Baltimore. Heck, you can point to his strong post ASB numbers as proof the talent is still there (even if I can't pinpoint to his direct impact on us winning games).


Matt P wrote:It shouldn't just be an option, it should be a priority. There is no way a mediocre defensive RF (yes, he has a great arm but overall his defense is mediocre) with a sub .800 OPS is worth over 15 million per year. He is a bottom of the order hitter at this point and the O's really need to look into trying to dump his salary.


A_K wrote:Guys, why would anyone trade for a guy who fits the description that we all seem to agree applies to Markakis? Not only does his contract make him a terrible investment for a rebuilding team, it also-- worst of all-- makes him untradeable. Chances are we'll start hearing his name mentioned as one of the worst contracts in baseball within the next year or two.


A_K wrote:Guys, why would anyone trade for a guy who fits the description that we all seem to agree applies to Markakis? Not only does his contract make him a terrible investment for a rebuilding team, it also-- worst of all-- makes him untradeable. Chances are we'll start hearing his name mentioned as one of the worst contracts in baseball within the next year or two.

Jordan wrote:Matt P wrote:It shouldn't just be an option, it should be a priority. There is no way a mediocre defensive RF (yes, he has a great arm but overall his defense is mediocre) with a sub .800 OPS is worth over 15 million per year. He is a bottom of the order hitter at this point and the O's really need to look into trying to dump his salary.
I'd say he's a tick above-average. Overall he's not a terrible player, but yes, definitely not worth $15 million.

DougDE wrote:Jordan wrote:Matt P wrote:It shouldn't just be an option, it should be a priority. There is no way a mediocre defensive RF (yes, he has a great arm but overall his defense is mediocre) with a sub .800 OPS is worth over 15 million per year. He is a bottom of the order hitter at this point and the O's really need to look into trying to dump his salary.
I'd say he's a tick above-average. Overall he's not a terrible player, but yes, definitely not worth $15 million.
Doesnt Markakis have 4 years left? And 42 million? I'm just going by what's being said on here but that doesnt seem to be 15 million a year to me

Jordan wrote:Matt P wrote:It shouldn't just be an option, it should be a priority. There is no way a mediocre defensive RF (yes, he has a great arm but overall his defense is mediocre) with a sub .800 OPS is worth over 15 million per year. He is a bottom of the order hitter at this point and the O's really need to look into trying to dump his salary.
I'd say he's a tick above-average. Overall he's not a terrible player, but yes, definitely not worth $15 million.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests