

birdwatcher55 wrote:Seems like Bridwell is kinda low; Ditto for Delmonico

birdwatcher55 wrote:Seems like Bridwell is kinda low; Ditto for Delmonico

Jordan Tuwiner wrote:That is a fair ranking for Delmonico. He has a great bat, but is probably limited to first base and likely won't develop enough power to play there.

birdwatcher55 wrote:That's early speculation really. My theory is those with a "great bat" can play anywhere


birdwatcher55 wrote:That's early speculation really. My theory is those with a "great bat" can play anywhere

birdwatcher55 wrote:My theory is those with a "great bat" can play anywhere
birdwatcher55 wrote:Where does Billy Butler fit in?? Would you like him in your lineup??? ... Few if any team has the perfect offensive/defensive mix


birdwatcher55 wrote:Where is the contradiction??? A great bat fits in anywhere (LF, 1B, RF) Take you pick. You make no sense with your condesending attitude



A_K wrote:No one is suggesting the Orioles cut Delmonico because he's a hopeless prospect with no value whatsoever. All people are saying is that based on projections-- which are often wrong!-- it doesn't appear that he'll be a good enough offensive player to compensate for his lack of a defensive position. That's all.

birdwatcher55 wrote:You need to give this guy time to develop his full game. If you ever played baseball or coached it, you will understand that young kids are pre-occupied with offense first and defense is something they usually don't work on initially. A lot of players get better by devoting more time with the glove and/or switching positions. Still got doubts?? Look no further than Mark Reynolds. He was atrocious at third base but put him on first and he was Gold Glove in the minds of a lot of people on this and other boards

Users browsing this forum: A_K, OriolesRedskins28 and 37 guests