Seafordeagles wrote:
Maybe just maybe they didn't want Saunders.
Which would be reasonable, given that Saunders isn't very good. What this doesn't clarify, however, is why they'd want Vargas, who is objectively even worse.
Seafordeagles wrote:
Maybe just maybe they didn't want Saunders.

ofahn wrote:
I posted this previously in the string about Morales.
I'm wondering how much of this went into LA's thinking.

A_K wrote:There are plenty of Vargas-level pitchers out there


ofahn wrote:
It should be an attractive proposition for them. They have a thin farm system and they need to have a back up plan for their bullpen. It may come down to whether they think they need relievers to START the season or relievers that will be ML ready by mid season. IMO the best package for both teams would be Ayala and a prospect, but I'm not sure DD will let him go.

Matt P wrote:
Like I said, they are in win now mode.

ofahn wrote:
Valid point; however, I fail to see how Vargas contributes to that.

Jordan Tuwiner wrote:Vargas is a fly ball pitcher and the Angels have what is probably the best defensive outfield in the league. He's a good bet to put up 200 innings and should perform better with the improved defense behind him.


ofahn wrote:
Valid point; however, I fail to see how Vargas contributes to that.

Matt P wrote:They wanted an innings eater and they think he can be just that.

ofahn wrote:
I agree with A_K. They could have done SO much better than Vargas considering they're going to spend over 7M on his salary this year.



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests