birdwatcher55 wrote:Come on guys.. get real..Lincecum is not going to pitch here on a one year $20mil plus contract. Not happening LOL
He doesn't have a choice if he's traded.
birdwatcher55 wrote:Come on guys.. get real..Lincecum is not going to pitch here on a one year $20mil plus contract. Not happening LOL


birdwatcher55 wrote:No trade clause?? Even if he didn't have one, don't see Baltimore paying the price for one year. It would mean cutting lose Reynolds and a few other key guys. Too high a price IMHO


ofahn wrote:
I conceded it was a small sample, BUT I felt it was an IMPORTANT sample because I would argue that it was the three most important games he ever started. The fact that he was not dominant in any of them is very telling.
Either I have not articulated myself well (if so, I'm sorry) or you misunderstand my point. I said that Greinke is IMO a #2 SP on a good team and that Lincecum would be OUR #1 SP. It really is a distinction WITH a difference. In effect, I'm saying that I rate Lincecum ahead of Greinke, although I'm not willing to label Lincecum as an Ace anymore. There are so few of them in baseball.
We MIGHT have two legitimate candidates for the label of Ace; Dylan Bundy and Kevin Gausman. I also believe that Chris Tillman has the POTENTIAL to be one; however, there's a lot of self confidence that needs to manifest itself within that young man before he gets there. To me an Ace is a SP that will get you DEEP into a "must win" game and pitch well enough that your team has a chance to win without an offensive explosion. He's the kind of pitcher that fans and players just KNOW is going to give you a chance to win every time he takes the mound.
It would be like Christmas (or Hanukkah) everyday if all three of those guys developed to that level, but I'd be happy with just one.
P.S. I sent you a PM but they're hanging up in the Outbox again. Look for it.

osforlife wrote:You've specifically said that Greinke wouldn't be our #1 pitcher. You've specifically said Lincecum would be our #1 pitcher. I respect your opinion that you believe Lincecum is the better pitcher; I think its ridiculous after the horrific year Lincecum had.

osforlife wrote:You've specifically said that Greinke wouldn't be our #1 pitcher. You've specifically said Lincecum would be our #1 pitcher. I respect your opinion that you believe Lincecum is the better pitcher; I think its ridiculous after the horrific year Lincecum had.




steve wrote:Well Giants arent gonna pay him 20 million as an long relief role.

Matt P wrote:As much as I like Lincecum I would be shocked if the O's made a move for him. The problem is, even with the bad season, he is still going to get paid like an ace next season. Not really a buy-low candidate.


steve wrote:Im not being rude ok? I dont know bout you guys. Some orioles fans hate peter angelos wishes he dies soon Im one of those fans. Like Baltimore Colts fans hated Irsay. Lets face it when Peter kicks the bucket his son takes over the O's and his son is nothing like his dad. Just like Jim Irsay was nothing like Bob. Jim Irsay spends on players his dad was cheap not to get good players. When Peters son takes over the Birds they will be just like the Dodgers under Magic Johnson. He will make agressive trades and sign good free agent players.

ofahn wrote:IMO the question becomes - if money is not an issue and the trade cost is the same (comp pick) would you rather have Peavy or Lincecum?

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests