Matt P wrote:
Because there is a slim chance he is as good as McLouth.
True, but several of these type of moves could be the difference in getting a Greinke over a Marcum.
Matt P wrote:
Because there is a slim chance he is as good as McLouth.

ofahn wrote:
Enough said. I have never seen him as a big game pitcher and he has shown the baseball world why since the beginning of September. I would rather sign Hammel to the contract that Jackson wants and I'm a bit reluctant to do THAT because we have a lot of SP talent that is finally emerging. Making expensive long term commitments to slightly above league average SPs just doesn't make sense to me; particularly when we have limited payroll room.
Consider this: Jackson made a must win start AT HOME yesterday and got smoked. Gonzalez made a must win start AT YANKEE STADIUM and threw a masterpiece. Why sign Jackson when we already have better?

osforlife wrote:True, but several of these type of moves could be the difference in getting a Greinke over a Marcum.

ofahn wrote:
I disagree with that.
The reason I want them to start the year in AAA working with Peterson is that I want them to be at their best when the come back to the ML. I see all four of them as having a GREAT DEAL MORE TALENT than Shawn Marcum and clearly they are much younger and less expensive.

ofahn wrote:
Again, I would rather sign Hammel to the contract that Lohse wants and I'm reluctant to do that for the same reasons as Jackson, although I will admit that I see Lohse as a better pitcher than Jackson.

osforlife wrote:We have a hole in our rotation.


Matt P wrote:Unless they are signing someone better than Tillman, Hammel, Chen, or Gonzalez there isn't a need to sign anyone to a multi year deal in terms of starting pitchers.

osforlife wrote:True, but several of these type of moves could be the difference in getting a Greinke over a Marcum.

Matt P wrote:
No way in Hell do they sign Greinke. They don't want to give out longer than 3 year deals to free agent pitchers and they don't want to pay nearly as much as it will cost to get him regardless of how much they save in other areas.
Besides, the Angels are rumored to be strongly considering declining the options on Santana and Haren and re-signing Greinke.

ofahn wrote:
Would you explain why you feel that way?
