Matt P wrote:Both are now in the bullpen. Good call.
I think he will be really good in the pen. I honestly think he still can start down the road, but I have a lot less doubt of him being successful in the pen.
Matt P wrote:Both are now in the bullpen. Good call.


Matt P wrote:I've been a fan of both in the bullpen for sometime now.
Now that he's back I can't wait for some more luck debate


Matt P wrote:Both are now in the bullpen. Good call.


birdwatcher55 wrote:Arrieta (along with Matusz) will be useful pieces in someone else's organization next year. Tired of waiting for potential. Just give my more Joe Saunders types!!!!!

Jordan Tuwiner wrote:I don't understand why you are in such a rush to get rid of them.
Why would you deal Matusz when his value is this low? Let him enjoy some success form the bullpen, and see what he can do next year with that extra confidence. His stuff looks a lot better in relief; hopefully it translate to the rotation if the stick him back there.



birdwatcher55 wrote:I don't think Matusz will ever amount to much, simply said. If you want to hang onto him for a situational LH then God Bless. But I would rather deal this so called "potential" for something tangible like Headley, who could be an all-star 3B next year in Camden Yards. Just my two cents



A_K wrote:No well run organization would give up on Matusz or Arrieta. They're young and have experienced success in the league. Perhaps the easiest scavenger hunt assignment in the world of baseball would be to go find young pitchers who had extended rough patches early in their big league careers. Making blanket statements about wanting to get rid of young pitchers is probably the easiest way to out yourself as a reactionary fan with a poor understanding of what it takes to build a deep, talented organization.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests