6 Days Left!!!!

[docjj]

The plot thickens. Most draft pundits have the O's taking a college arm- Zimmer or Gausman. Will they go the predictable route and take one of them? or will they surprise and take Correa? Will they super-surprise and take Giolito?

My guess is they go the predictable route and take Gausman.

[CSPitt17130]

Another thing I've heard most places (Law, BA, etc.) is that the O's want the best player available. That's all I want (as long as the player they think is the best can at least be reasonably argued as the best player available and there isn't another Hobgood situation where the O's are the only team who thinks the player is the BPA).

[docjj]

Two schools of thought on the draft:

1. Take the guy with the highest ceiling. The guy who could become a superstar, if he reaches his maximum potential and stays healthy.

2. Take the guy who will be a solid contributor, and carries less risk. Most draftees fail to make the Major Leagues, and that includes most 1st rounders. Maybe you're better off in the long run taking safer bets than ending up with nothing from your 1st rounders (Brandon Snyder, Billy Rowell, Matt Hobgood, on and on and on....)


My feeling is if you're picking in the top 5, you might as well go for broke. Take the guy with the superstar potential.

For me, this year that list would include Buxton (almost certainly will be gone by the time we pick), Carlos Correa (wouldn't he look great with Schoop and Machado also in the fold), and my personal favorite- Lucas Giolito. Giolito, in my opinion having seen him pitch, is the top arm with Ace potential. I'm not at all concerned about his strained UCL. Worst case scenario, he might re-injure it and require TJ. Big deal, every pitcher in the Majors has had Tommy John surgery.

[CSPitt17130]

I don't think those two are separate ideas. You factor in floor, ceiling, and risk into a "single package" and look at the overall value of that package. It's not necessarily one or the other as a philosophy.

[Matt P]

I am hoping that Correa or Buxton is available at #4 and the O's take one of them.

[Old Sneakers]

My board has changed a little...
(The ranking here is based on the Orioles not overall talent)

Top 8
RHP Lucas Giolito* (Is he really healthy? Is he the same guy?)
OF Byron Buxton (Loads of Potential)
RHP Kevin Gausman (Could be a #2 SP or a #5)
RHP Mark Apple (Of the top prospects, could be the most underwhelming)
C Mike Zunino (Fine prospect at a position where he would be second fiddle)
OF David Dahl (Safe bet to be a fine corner outfielder with good power)
SS Carlos Correa (Probably a third baseman with a really good bat)
RHP Kyle Zimmer (Could be a #3 SP but right now a FB/CB guy that has a lot of questions)


Lots to read here, I felt my opinions needed to be written down and would love feedback from others

I ranked Giolito first as prior to injury he was the early consensus first overall choice. I have to think that every MLB team has a good feel for where this player really is and what his floor/ceiling actually is. Unlike armchair GM's like me that rely upon web sources which are always suspect. The question is: Does he go first overall or is he available at the tenth pick? For me it's really a toss up between him and Buxton.

Many sources have warned that Buxton is no sure thing. That said though he has a chance to become that rare "Arch-Type Ricky Henderson" something every team would love to have on the roster. I've even ready some predicting a long minor league carreer. That may be so, however this is a rare tool guy.

At this point is where I place the second tier guys. Gausman is whom most sources have the Orioles picking as I do myself. Everything I read says his fastball is something of beauty and his change up is pretty solid. That said successive pitches need work. Right now that is his slider and curveball so he is going to need time and instruction. That fastball though makes him easy to place at #3 on my Orioles draft board.

Another guy that has a sweet fastball is Mark Apple and like Guasman needs some help with his secondary pitches. He's not had the season that scouts had hoped for and I wonder is he playing worried? Sometimes prior to the draft we worry about pitchers playing up to the radar gun. This year I am asking is this guy afraid of lowering his draft stock? That may well be a silly question on my part that is out of bounds. Something though is wrong and that is my best guess. Regardless right now that Fastball is good and the slider isn't bad either. The change up will take some time. He's likely safer than Guasman but the potential isn't so high.

Mike Zunino is arguably the second best talent in this year's draft. As an Orioles fan I am somewhat biased as we have an excellent Catcher. If I took that out of it he would be the easy #3 on my board. He projects to be an outstanding defensive catcher being solid all around as well as having power at the plate. I have this nagging feeling that he will drop to fifth or sixth pick in the draft which means someone will overvalue Correa and look really foolish in five years.

This is where most people following the draft will strongly disagree with me but I really like David Dahl. Everything I read says he has no chance to stay in Center field but will be an outstanding corner outfielder that will profile nicely at the number three hole in any lineup. Additionally while he doesn't have elite speed he is ever so slightly above average on the bases and should hit for close to .300 Basically an everyday outfielder with more power than Nick Markakis. I do not think he is a prospect in the same league with the Royals' Wil Myers, but he will become an excellent everyday guy at a position the Orioles seem to lack talent.

I should note that some folks are high on Carlos Correa. He may well become a fine player. However Don's observation from a few weeks ago has me re-thinking it.

Carlos Correa - There is more contact in the bat than power, but enough pop to profile at any position outside of 1B. The glove and range, plus the bottom heavy body has always made me move him off.

We have a guy we aren't sure will stick at SS now and while depth up the middle is a wonderful thing, I just do not think it's the right player for that risk at this time. Additionally it's still a projection that his "Pop" at the plate will represent a good value at third base. I may eat crow in a few years but I feel strongly that this is a player teams whisper that he may be elite when he isn't.

Kyle Zimmer one thought to be a potential choice for the team looks more like an Andy McPhail type player to me. Yes his fastball looks good and he has a curve that is solid. However, his fastball velocity isn't consistent and I do not know that his third pitch will ever really come on. That said I do not feel that he is a good value at 1:4 To my thinking it would make more sense to select Wacha or Fried and bring them along very slowly.

Now if you actually read all of that please enjoy and throw eggs at my board that stacks the prospects regardless of the Orioles situation

OF Byron Buxton
RHP Lucas Giolito
C Mike Zunino
RHP Kevin Gausman
RHP Mark Apple
SS Carlos Correa
OF David Dahl
RHP Kyle Zimmer
RHP Michael Wacha
LHP Max Fried

As you see I think a great deal of Buxton in both lists. With Giolito its his medical questions and how long it will be before his minor league career begins. Quality Catchers do not grow on trees and I think Zunino has what teams need. Beyond this it is a matter of risk and potential. Can you live with Correa at 3B? Gausman and Apple as average starters? If anyone moves up I think it's Dahl and if any of the teams picking early have the luxury of time with starting pitching then Wacha and Fried will be good selections.

Sorry for the book. But please respond. I think we can easily figure out how the draft will fall.

[Jordan Tuwiner]

Great post, Old Sneakers. Rep to you.

I'm honestly not familiar with all of the draft prospects as much as I usually am (due to my time out of the county), but I just spent an hour or so reading up on them.

I think the obvious choice for the Orioles at #4 is Buxton if he's available, but it seems like there's absolutely no chance he falls.

Giolito is still that high on your board even with such uncertainty?

I think it'll be Gausman in the end as well.

[Rising O's]

Still no change for me. I'll take Giolito (medicals are fine allegedly), Gausman, Correa, or Appel/Zimmer. I think the Orioles would take Buxton in an instant. But all of these players are worthy of #4. There should be some quality outfield prospects available in the 2nd round 65th pick.

I wonder if 1.5 million, in the 3rd round would be enough for the Orioles to entice Nick Williams to forego Texas, like it did with Nick Delmonico.

[birdwatcher55]

I am hoping that Correa or Buxton is available at #4 and the O's take one of them.

Doubt either one will be there

[CSPitt17130]

Still no change for me. I'll take Giolito (medicals are fine allegedly), Gausman, Correa, or Appel/Zimmer. I think the Orioles would take Buxton in an instant. But all of these players are worthy of #4. There should be some quality outfield prospects available in the 2nd round 65th pick.

I wonder if 1.5 million, in the 3rd round would be enough for the Orioles to entice Nick Williams to forego Texas, like it did with Nick Delmonico.

Where are you suggesting they get that 1.5 million?

[Rising O's]

The money is there. It will just require a very similar approach to 2011's draft.

[OriolesRedskins28]

I would prefer Correa. He gets comps to Ryan Zimmerman and Troy Tulowitzki. It would be great to have a gold glove third baseman who hits for average and power. He could be the cornerstone of the team like a Zimmerman or a Longoria. Or if the organization decides he has a better shot of sticking at SS than Machado that would be fine too. I know Correa's value is based on being a SS but I would be thrilled picking him as a third baseman. Gausman and Zimmer both have questions marks surrounding them so I would be very happy taking Correa who is noted as a hard worker.

[ofahn]

I would prefer Correa.

While I would prefer to pick a college arm that could be ML ready next year I can see the benefit of Correa. In fact, if the team signed Soler and picked Correa the Orioles would begin to develop a following with young players in Latin America. Add Machado (Latino lite) and it could be a major recruiting aid.

[birdwatcher55]

Correa would be a great pick for us but right now it looks like we're taking Gausman, per Callis at BBA

[CSPitt17130]

The money is there. It will just require a very similar approach to 2011's draft.

Are you aware of the new spending cap?