
ofahn wrote:birdwatcher55 wrote:He's gone through two or three pitching coaches during that span. I wonder if someone tinkered with his delivery and in the process messed him up. What I did see last year briefly was improvement after Griffin worked with him in Norfolk. I'm not sure what his future is in Baltimore, if any, but he certainly has a lot to prove
I see Tillman's problem as a failure by our development staff to require him to become a legitimate starting pitcher. By that I mean that he was never required to learn how to get past the sixth inning, or even get that far when he didn't have his best stuff. He was also never required to get into the kind of shape that would allow him to have something left in the tank after 100 pitches.
Look at Tillman's stats when we got him and last year at AAA. He's still a 5 and 2/3 inning pitcher. That's a DEVELOPMENT Issue.

birdwatcher55 wrote:Just my two cents: Arrieta might be better suited to close games

birdwatcher55 wrote:You think coming through the Seattle system he would have learned all of that before coming to Baltimore.



TuckerBlair89 wrote:I wonder what would happen if he pitched like this the entire spring. Does he still get sent to the minors?

TuckerBlair89 wrote:Bumping this thread.
Tillman looked really good in his last outing (aired on TV). I came away fairly impressed by his stuff. His fastball looked much more crisp, and he was hitting 95 occasionally. Perhaps more impressive were the amount of ground balls and lazy fly balls that he was getting. Of course it was only two innings, but any improvement should be noted.
I wonder what would happen if he pitched like this the entire spring. Does he still get sent to the minors?


Don wrote:It is still rather flat without movement and you have to wonder if that second time around the order poses issues. He is still posing a collapsing delivery off to the glove side, which is a great timing mechanism that has to be perfect to maintain command and control of his pitches.
Fine that he is strong enough to reach those speeds, but without out constant movement and location it may not help in a starter role.

birdwatcher55 wrote:Just my two cents: Arrieta might be better suited to close games
ofahn wrote:birdwatcher55 wrote:Just my two cents: Arrieta might be better suited to close games
Why do you say that? When he has been around the plate he has at least shown an ability to get into the seventh or longer. To me, TILLMAN is a guy who has closer stuff. I'm not so sure about the head................


Don wrote:I would reserve any Jake to the closer role until he proves the bone spur and spur development since TCU is the blame for his command.
I think it was in poor taste for both local and national media to pigeon hole the kid into any role with an arsenal that could sit a top of many rotations. I would not sip their Kool-aid until every single option is exhausted.

Don wrote:I would reserve any Jake to the closer role until he proves the bone spur and spur development since TCU is the blame for his command.
I think it was in poor taste for both local and national media to pigeon hole the kid into any role with an arsenal that could sit a top of many rotations. I would not sip their Kool-aid until every single option is exhausted.

birdwatcher55 wrote:With all due respect, I'm not sure he is TOR material right now.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests