
ofahn wrote:
It's a matter of finances. They aren't going to pay what it would cost their broadcast crew to travel.

steve wrote:
Look at the Mets & Yankees they Televise every home game and when Yankees play the Sox they televise them both at home and road.

ofahn wrote:
OK, that's true, but how is it related to the issue at hand?



docjj wrote:Not me. I don't think this team has done anything to improve itself. I look for regression to the mean in terms of statistics which means poorer record in 1 run games and extra inning games. We lack a true leadoff guy, middle of the order bat, top of the rotation ace. I see our competitors in Tampa Bay and Toronto have upgraded. Boston was able to dig itself out of crippling contracts thanks to the total morons in Los Angeles. The only good thing is I think the Yankees will start to slide...- this will be fun to see if it happens...

docjj wrote:Not me. I don't think this team has done anything to improve itself. I look for regression to the mean in terms of statistics which means poorer record in 1 run games and extra inning games. We lack a true leadoff guy, middle of the order bat, top of the rotation ace. I see our competitors in Tampa Bay and Toronto have upgraded. Boston was able to dig itself out of crippling contracts thanks to the total morons in Los Angeles. The only good thing is I think the Yankees will start to slide...- this will be fun to see if it happens...

thezeroes wrote:I had explained in the easiest possible way with two post in this topic that the ONE RUN GAMES were NOT a product of luck but of a developed skill level within the ball club and the management team on the field. You seem to dismiss this premise out of hand without any explanation and I need to ask why.

A_K wrote: It is statistically defensible therefore to claim the Orioles have an advantage in close games based on a team skill. It is, however, impossible to claim that the Orioles extreme good fortune in close contests last season didn't include a hefty dose of luck on top of a small portion of skill.

ofahn wrote:
...and a valid argument that the Orioles' extreme BAD fortune in key injuries cost us four or five games in the win column. IMO this is a winning team that will probably be better than the opposition between 85 and 95 times this season.

ofahn wrote:
...and a valid argument that the Orioles' extreme BAD fortune in key injuries cost us four or five games in the win column. IMO this is a winning team that will probably be better than the opposition between 85 and 95 times this season.

thezeroes wrote:



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests