

Jordan Tuwiner wrote:I still think Saunders would be the best move.




osforlife wrote:Jeff Karstens was just signed by the Pirates. I think he would have been a nice option for the 5th starter. It's now basically down to Joe Saunders and Shaun Marcum for me. I think we still need to sign a starter.

osforlife wrote:Jeff Karstens was just signed by the Pirates. I think he would have been a nice option for the 5th starter. It's now basically down to Joe Saunders and Shaun Marcum for me. I think we still need to sign a starter.

ofahn wrote:
Each team that fills their last spot in the rotation makes it that much easier for us to sign Saunders for the price we see as fair. I think that Joe made a huge mistake believing that he was worth a four year deal, and then not accepting reality when it became apparent that the league did not agree with his assessment.
I can see a one year deal with a vested option.


rudyrooster wrote:Don't count out Britton and Johnson. I personally believe that they are the two O's "young guns" with the most upside. Guys that have an understanding of what it takes to be a MLB pitcher. Big league pitching is so much more a mental game as a physical game. These 2 guys have shown me that they have "good enough stuff" and (even more so) the intangibles to succeed (if healthy) at the major league level...just my humble opinion...


A_K wrote:I still see S. Johnson as a nice guy to have in your organization but someone who should never really be in your mind when you're planning your roster. He has value as rotation depth in AAA or as a long reliever (and rotation depth) in the majors, and if he continues to excel and force his way into your rotation, or finds his way there due to injuries and shows he belongs, that's fine. But otherwise I'd say a smart front office should look at his peripheral numbers and presume he isn't part of their short or long-term plans.

A_K wrote:I still see S. Johnson as a nice guy to have in your organization but someone who should never really be in your mind when you're planning your roster. He has value as rotation depth in AAA or as a long reliever (and rotation depth) in the majors, and if he continues to excel and force his way into your rotation, or finds his way there due to injuries and shows he belongs, that's fine. But otherwise I'd say a smart front office should look at his peripheral numbers and presume he isn't part of their short or long-term plans.

Jordan Tuwiner wrote:I think this stands true when looking at him as a starter, but I think he makes a great reliever.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests